Wiki participants, if they live long enough, generally follow this life cycle (evolution has the unfortunate connotation of always being positive):
Is it usually like so? For me, stages 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, never happened. I put up my own wiki instantly after stage 2, but not because I wanted a better-working wiki, just because I wanted to experiment. (Of course, that wiki did grow into something.) For me, the big revelation was that "hey, these people actually care about the content of this place" - that this was something being worked on. That was new and exciting for me.
The above list is surprisingly pugnacious. The only thing I've ever complained about in wiki is that I felt quite unsupported when I got (by accident) into a stupid flamewar on JapanCountry? as a fresh and not-so-confident WikiZen.
I also wonder about creating pages being placed before editing pages in the list. I never felt a great urge to create my own pages on wiki - I've done it only a couple of times and mostly they've been left untouched by other people (undeleted, too). On a related note, nobody ever made a threadmess of my writings and even though I would like to refactor (for supporting the community) I always have the feeling that the discussions have good information in them. Maybe reading threadmess doesn't bother me enough.
I'm at level 4 1/2. And I think that's the optimum level. --KrisJohnson
I'd say I'm at level 6, except I actually want to refactor more than write. I learn more that way.
Can you go directly from 4 to 6? I never get irritated by a "bunch of [crapping] idiots". The occasional troll gets me down, but instead of taking the bait, I go reorginize the MakeProgram pages, something nice and uncontroversial. -- SeanOleary (Except when it comes to GNU make vs BSD make)
Some minor skipping or reordering of the stages has been observed in various people.
I'm at 20. Nice place, but lonely.
I refused to describe my addiction as typified by any level described above. So I added a new level, not meant to be the highest level, or level to which to ascribe, but one I can comfortably relate to. Evolution is about improvement. A Wikizen doesn't give up to egocentricity and making the world in his own image. Shouldn't Wikizenship be about learning and teaching in a community with worthwhile things to say and do? Isn't it all about making the place better?
Of course what you say is true. The original list was, I believe, intended to be a half-joking description of the (unfortunately) typical person who takes wiki way too seriously, gets disillusioned when the high wears off, and subsequently feels the need to start bad-mouthing wiki and its participants.
When i was at the "there's so many pages" level, i was skeptical about the higher levels - why would i want to refactor rather than write? Why would i want to start my own wiki - WardsWiki is everything i could ask for and more! And yet, i have now got my own wiki, and i haven't been reading this wiki for ages. Damn. I never went through the refactoring stage, though, although i did want to refactor; it just seemed like everything was being refactored nicely by a certain RefactoringWildMan as it was.
There's also a parallel route that splits off after stage 3 - WikiRapture. Depending on the person involved the condition may fade after an initial burst, or, in some cases, never depart, getting them shot down in flames on page after page and then causing them to leave Wiki in a huff.
If you want real evolution - not just progressing through time, how about:
Also see: WikiYear, WikiMaster, [http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?CommunityRoles MeatBall:CommunityRoles]