A Wired article about TedNelson's XanaduProject.
...and Nelson's response at http://web.archive.org/web/20001101230424/http://www2.educ.ksu.edu/Faculty/McGrathD/Fall99/NelsonLtr.htm in which he says
From Nelson's response:
"Wolf's article is a very nasty piece of work."
I agree entirely. -- DavidSarahHopwood
A rather unsympathetic article, in fact. One might call it a hatchet job. It contains many subtle digs of tone and implication; TedNelson does not come out of it looking very good. He considers it unfair. -- DaveHarris
The permanent-re-perfection-loop sounds a lot like CharlesBabbage. Building device A gave him insights into a more flexible calculation engine, B. So he abandons A and starts on B. Well, building B gave him further insights into the possibilities of engine C. The end result is that he gradually turned a calculator into a TuringComplete computer, the first one (design), but never produced a finished product (some were half-working).
One never knows with an article how well it stacks up next to events, but I would have to say that the Wired article portrays one of the best (and most sad) examples of AnalysisParalysis that I've ever seen in print. It is definitely worth looking at. If only they had users.. If only they could make something and use it themselves.
There is a sense in which the article is very well written. In particular, there is a great recurring riff where Xanadu folks keep saying "six more months, six more months". At the very end of the article, MarkMiller? is quoted as saying "If I only had three programmers for two months..."
A great quote:
I saw TedNelson speak in Sydney in 1994, just as the web was really taking off. I asked him what he thought about it, and he said he didn't really find it very interesting. This struck me and still strikes me as the most astonishing thing he could have said.
Xanadu was a good idea, but if you can't adapt your ideas to circumstances, you can't get them to go any place no matter how good they are. -- PeterMerel
Yes, but this should not have astonished you. Consider: here he's been hyping a global hypertext system for decades, and then along comes the web, which is very primitive compared with what he advocated, but GoodEnough that people were perhaps vastly less interested in his vision afterwards (the vaporware thing didn't help, of course).
So he's got sour grapes. This isn't the wisest reaction in the world, but surely it's only human, not astonishing. -- DougMerritt