Big Science

This is the type of science typical of modernity. Some see it as a result of the increasing level of education of the general population. Some see it as a result of necessity. Some believe that ComputerScience (and its technological contributions to society) may reduce the need for science to be conducted in this way. For an example, see "ANewKindOfScience" by StephenWolfram (ISBN 1579550088 ).

It's (arguably) a GoodThing.

Examples:


Does "big" necessarily involve large, heavy pieces of machinery? Or does merely large numbers of people qualify -- such as

Sounds like big science to me... Of course, they also developed some pretty groundbreaking computer machinery there, so it works on either count.


OK, this is "merely" BigEngineering?, but I've been told that the largest single project ever (in terms of material moved, people involved, mortality, etc.) was


Contrast ApolloProject? with SpaceShipOne.

Granted that the later project has benefited from the earlier, but the newer effort has accomplished more in less time on less money (by an order of magnitude) than the older.

Can conclusions about SmallerScience? be derived from this?

What science did either Apollo or SS1 do? They are mainly feats of engineering, I think. Or was that the point, big science is about making a big impact in society not solving big questions (although Hubble, Manhattan, Cern etc. arguably did both)

An order of magnitude more for early stuff doesn't seam at odds with pioneering projects in other areas. BeagleTwo? is a good example of what happens when you don't spend the money and time.


Comparing SpaceShipOne with Apollo is pretty far-fetched. SS1 is merely suborbital. It doesn't even compare with MercuryProject?.


October 2006: Currently the NationalCancerInstitute? has a big emphasis on BigScience. For example, redoing the HumanGenomeProject? except on several flavors of cancer cells rather than normal cells. The downside to this is that the cash going to BigScience is drawn away from cash that used to go to SmallScience?. SmallScience? in this context means the NationalInstitutesOfHealth? R01 granting mechanism that primarily funds individual independent laboratories at various academic insitutions. This is a big gamble because the BigScience in question here doesn't involve big intellectual contribution from many scientists, but rather mostly requires BigCash? to pay for robotic and automated systems. The net effect is a reduction in the HumanCapital? associated with cancer research. The jury is still out on whether it's worth trading the humans in for robots in this instance. Again, it could be argued that this is BigEngineering? rather than BigScience.


An album by LaurieAnderson?


Contributors: WaylonFlinn, AnonymousDonors


EditText of this page (last edited October 11, 2006) or FindPage with title or text search