Benign Neglect

This is a term I've been using to describe the management here at a client. There is no explicit direction from the IS head, which happens to be a financial guy, but there is support for initiative from the IS department managers and even, in some cases, individuals. This culture is common throughout the company, which is privately held. Individual initiative is preferred rather than top-down centralized control. Thus there are few clearly-marked lines of authority. It would seem on the surface that this is a very good arrangement, very empowering and all, and it's true - it does create a nice, collegiate atmosphere - but I think there is a dark side.

The problem comes when the IS department, as a team, is eventually expected to provide benefit to the company's bottom line. At this point in its lifecycle, significant effort is spent looking inward to architecture, methodology and so on. This is all well and good (it helps pay my salary, after all), but it is not clear what brings this process to an end. The ones running the show in IS are setting their own scope - they are their own customer. Without accountability to the business, the process could be never-ending. So at the end of the day, whose "fault" is it?

One could say that the leaders in IS should have more personal discipline and prevent such projects from ballooning that way. But this is not just an individual phenomenon. This is a "game" that involves several players, and no one individual is to blame.

No, I think it is the fault of the top leadership. Top management must recognize that the behavior of a team is not the same as that of an individual. Just because you have a group of highly motivated, bright, talented people does not mean that you have a well-functioning, productive team. The team must be trained with theory and practice to achieve the results they are expected to achieve.

If an owner of say, a horse, just lets the horse graze all day and hang around the farm, and does not train it, he should not be surprised if that horse is useless when he really wants to ride it somewhere or do something else useful with it. A team is more like that horse - it has to be cared for, trained, disciplined, and used in the way it is intended. Neglect just leads to problems, benign or not.

-- JeffMantei 2000-11-29

Compare FairProcess.


EditText of this page (last edited March 27, 2014) or FindPage with title or text search