Have any experiments in large-scale work-place democracy been tried? If not, what about incremental steps like having underlings evaluate bosses, and having some of that affect their evaluation (or at least "areas of improvement").
Semi-Democracy via Weights
I don't expect that peons like me will have a significant influence if orgs do start such, but it would be nice to have some say-so. A rank-based weighting approach can be used for voting.
Here is one approach to assigning weights based on rank. This example has 3 levels.
1. Lowest rank 2. Medium rank 3. Top rank p = total points = 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 (rank level quantity x 2) Vote Allocations (weights): Lowest rank = 1 / p =~ 0.1667 Medium rank = 2 / p =~ 0.3333 Top rank = 3 / p =~ 0.5 Note total of weighting factors adds up to 1.0
Two-way Feedback
It would be helpful if underlings could at least identify "areas needing improvement" in a given manager which the next higher manager sees during the evaluation. The manager him/herself wouldn't see the statements to avoid retaliation. Often managers have a few very annoying traits that keep them from being tolerable. There is often very little career pressure for them to correct these problem spots because they hide them from their superiors, so the traits remain year after year unchecked, driving underlings crazy.
Possible evaluation form from "underlings", may be ranked on a number scale:
CategoryEmployment, CategoryManagement
Other search terms: management evaluation