Musashi's:
Twelve Rules of How to Get Along With People:
Thanks for being careful not to infringe upon a copyright. -- WardCunningham
I hear from a friend studying it that there are literally two schools of thought in modern PoliticalScience? studies.
But when software recovers from a failure, there is no loser whom we had to defeat. The problem with the above mentioned 'Realists' is, that they want to win at the expense of others.
That's a bit harsh... the realist simply wants to see that they don't come out worse. It's not like they are actively seeking conflict. Trying to avoid conflict at the cost of being more likely to lose when the conflicts arise is not an optimal strategy.
Plus, making sure we win in case of conflict is a way like another to avoid it - which isn't the case for software (software won't fail less often when you're ready for failures). The problem with realism is when everyone acts that way, in which case you get a situation akin to the PrisonersDilemma.
I took this chapter as better Netiquette, RulesToLiveBy in our AutoLisp usenet community: http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/autocad/news/faq/autolisp.html and http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/autocad/wiki/RulesToLiveBy It is shorter and richer than the usual usenet netiquette. See also EmailNetiquettePatterns and ProofBeforePosting. -- ReiniUrban
RefuseToGossip: Good advice. I expect the writer wasn't cynical enough to extend it: Tell No Lies! Sadly, it is my experience that there are (a few) people who will fabricate things about others just to be unpleasant. :-( Mind you, anyone who looks at this page probably doesn't need my extended advice; they wouldn't tell lies anyway. Just my two penny-worth. -- SteveMerrick 25/April/2002
A shorter and yet more encompassing list....
An even shorter "list" that accomplishes the same thing as all of these above:
1. You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
(see GoldenRule)
And who is my neighbor?
Everyone.
I would like to register a warning opinion here: I worry that this sort of list has a tendency to emphasize others' needs at the expense of our own. I see little in the list about self-protection, and while I disagree with self-protection at others' expense, there needs to be some balance.
For example, to counterbalance #4, I would add "Allow yourself to have your own feelings." IOW, if you feel merry or sorrowful, find an appropriate way to express those feelings, even if others don't share them. -- BrentNewhall
I would submit that #4 implies that everyone gets to express their feelings -- we can't all simultaneously be trying to feel what someone else is; there must be at least one "prime emoter" somewhere.
Also, an implication of the GoldenRule is that you love yourself too.
Keep your balls in a bag and your head up high - 20th century mini-motto for low ranking servicemen
Further readings on this wiki:
DoNotWorryAboutTheCredit may be good personally but it is EXTREMELY bad business advice. Following that is a sure way to get less than you deserve.
It's a rule for getting things done, not a rule for getting credit for getting things done. --BenAveling
Fully knowing a rule means knowing any exceptions to the rule.
(cf. ShuHaRi, ThreeStagesInJeetKuneDo, ThreeLevelsOfAudience)
Your horse should be at least 5 times your own weight.
Before speaking ask three questions:
1) will you speak the truth? 2) will you say something kind? 3) will you say something that is *really* neccesary?
If "no" to any, don't speak.