Post Modernist Programming LanguageLanguages with something from every programming paradigm, style, era, whatever.
The PerlLanguage is an paradigmatic example of this:
LarryWall says:
LarryWall has also presented a paper on this: http://www.wall.org/~larry/pm.html
The PythonLanguage supports several programming paradigms as well, but there's only one (syntactic) way to do each; see PythonVsPerl.
LispClos? and CeePlusPlus are also heading that way.
CommonLisp (not LispClos?), is not heading that way --- it's been that way for twenty years. And you don't need the godawful line noise syntax. And you can usually read your code the next day. --SmugLispWeenie.
Ironic, isn't it? :)
It is. Perl made sense in its original form, gluing together some often used unix tools for system administration tasks. As a general purpose language it touted 'flexiblity' as a killer advantage. However, as noted here, Common Lisp is simultaneously more flexible, more powerful (vastly), faster (vastly), and maitainable (vastly) than perl....
EditText of this page
(last edited March 26, 2004)
or FindPage with title or text search