UML tools model systems in terms of a huge set of OO primitives, BON tool(s) in terms of objects and contracts, but what would a tool for modeling in terms of home-made pattern languages look like?
Some of the features might be:
As an object-oriented programmer, I've been guilty of finding UML occasionally useful for documenting and making sense of object relationships. I like to be able to look at an aspect of a design and think "yes, that's obviously sensible", and sometimes looking at a diagram makes that much easier for me.
I'm not an object-oriented programmer anymore, but I do still like piccies. Classes, objects, aggregations, processes, modules, ...., TheyreAllPatternsAnyway?, so why not just have a simple tool for organising them. Instead of expressing my diagrams in terms of the UML metamodel, I'll express them as a system of patterns from the pattern language that seems most appropriate for my problem.
For example, in modeling an Erlang system I might want the following "Pattern[: participants]" language:
These things are okay to draw on paper, but today I feel like I'd like to have a tool to help. I wonder if a tool could be built that is to describing (discovering?) pattern-based systems what Wiki is to discussing patterns.
-- LukeGorrie
Doesn't the TogetherJ tool provide some sort of support for the Gof patterns? Has anybody here used it?
I did have a play with the Whiteboard edition of TogetherJ a little while ago, and I do believe it had a repository for commonly used designs and you could create new projects based upon these designs. --StuartBarker Strike that, just had a scan of the TogetherJ website (www.togetherj.com) and couldn't find anything about it. --SB