It is too common among programmers to use the word loose when the word ought to be lose.
Loose is pronounced loos (with an S sound, like a snake), and it means
I've seen this mistake frequently in email and such, but I really understood how common it was when Mandrake Linux warned me to be careful about performing a certain operation. Apparently I could "loose data." Oh no! I thought. We can't have all that loose data floating around! How would we ever get it back in the computer? It would be like stuffing toothpaste back into the tube.
On this same system, grep turned up even more instances, in user messages and comments. Here are some of the better ones.
There's a boat in our marina with the name Loosers Weepers. (Of course it's a powerboat, you had to ask?)
It has become all too common for learned and otherwise quite competent people to be reckless in their attention to correct spelling or grammar. Such errors are found not only in the examples like the one cited above but even in such documents as that of a Doctoral Thesis! It seems that not only writers, but also those who review, exhibit the same characteristic.
Interestingly, I also erred in my first posting, by using "to" instead of "too" incorrectly as the fifth word. -- DonaldNoyes
Doctor's Thesis or Doctoral Thesis? -- JonathanTang
Analysist or Analyst?
It's usually the native English speakers who mistake words that have similar pronunciation. Lose vs loose I see mistaken almost explicitly only by native speakers, more often by the young ones. Where I live (Finland), I'm not sure if I've ever seen anyone reasonably literate in English make that mistake. We, however, do have our own sets of mistakes regarding capitalization of words and such, since our own language has different rulesets on those.
RefactorEnglish instead of nag me, Loozer!
See also FunnyErrorsOnWiki
What the heck, it is always easy to lose a few loose nuts and bolts now and again.
See LedNotLead, RefactorEnglish