Lisp Is Not Camel Case
Lisp Is Not Camel CaseBecause CamelCase requires you to hit SHIFT a lot. Real Lisp programmers use a hyphen. More readable than CamelCase and less obnoxious than an underscore, although
call-with-current-continuationin SchemeLanguage is a bit ugly, so real Schemers use
call/ccAny such examples in CommonLisp?
Hmm, I'm fairly sure that Lisp would use underscores in names if one didn't ordinarily need to hit shift for them.
EditText of this page
(last edited January 14, 2006)
or FindPage with title or text search