It seems that "Autonomic Computing" is more of a feature wishlist than a definition:
from the site ...
An autonomic computing system needs to "know itself" - its components must also possess a system identity. Since a "system" can exist at many levels, an autonomic system will need detailed knowledge of its components, current status, ultimate capacity, and all connections to other systems to govern itself. It will need to know the extent of its "owned" resources, those it can borrow or lend, and those that can be shared or should be isolated.
An autonomic computing system must configure and reconfigure itself under varying (and in the future, even unpredictable) conditions. System configuration or "setup" must occur automatically, as well as dynamic adjustments to that configuration to best handle changing environments.
An autonomic computing system never settles for the status quo - it always looks for ways to optimize its workings. It will monitor its constituent parts and fine-tune workflow to achieve predetermined system goals.
An autonomic computing system must perform something akin to healing - it must be able to recover from routine and extraordinary events that might cause some of its parts to malfunction. It must be able to discover problems or potential problems, then find an alternate way of using resources or reconfiguring the system to keep functioning smoothly.
A virtual world is no less dangerous than the physical one, so an autonomic computing system must be an expert in self-protection. It must detect, identify and protect itself against various types of attacks to maintain overall system security and integrity.
An autonomic computing system must know its environment and the context surrounding its activity, and act accordingly. It will find and generate rules for how best to interact with neighboring systems. It will tap available resources, even negotiate the use by other systems of its underutilized elements, changing both itself and its environment in the process -- in a word, adapting.
An autonomic computing system cannot exist in a hermetic environment. While independent in its ability to manage itself, an it must function in a heterogeneous world and implement open standards -- in other words, an autonomic computing system cannot, by definition, be a proprietary solution.
An autonomic computing system will anticipate the optimized resources needed while keeping its complexity hidden. It must marshal I/T resources to shrink the gap between the business or personal goals of the user, and the I/T implementation necessary to achieve those goals -- without involving the user in that implementation.
Sounds like DoWhatImean Computing. Here - have a lollipop.
They probably joked about flying when Wilbur and Orville said a flying machine could be made by a pair of bicycle mechanics!
Why? Lots of people had tried with some success before Wilbur and Orville started playing with the problem.... there was 100 year history of incremental successes to build on.
People often make jokes because they do not understand that some historical incidents are historical rather than incremental.
It seems that "Autonomic Computing" is more of a feature wishlist than a definition.
Wishlists often can be converted into real things by the GoodProgrammerGreatHabits (the bicycle mechanics of computing).
And maybe this wishlist is like the core practices of XP: You need to do them all to get to a qualitativly higher level. Doing only some or doing them only partly will not show much benefit.
But on the other hand: Who knows if it it this list that has that effect and not a slightly other list.
See: http://www.nitix.com/technologies/autonomic.php
See also: http://www.mbtmag.com/current_issues/2006/mar/integInfra6.asp
See: PiCalculus GaplessSequences